See also http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/83045A4221DD2AB5CC2575D200165557
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/fry/F3F97E7FC3FEC848CC2575D300180202
« Last edit by Bronwyn Holloway-Smith on Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:03 am. »
Page: 1
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
|
#1 Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:39 am
|
|
Administrator
![]() Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 433
|
In further analysis of the French decision the NBR writes on the courts response that "exercising freedom of expression and communication, including that performed over the internet, is a prerequisite for democracy [...] Attacks on the exercise of this freedom must be necessary, appropriate and proportionate to the aim pursued," InternetNZ agree, adding that “New Zealand too has a strong assertion to individual freedom of expression and human rights. The French decision serves as a reminder that enacting such draconian copyright law is both disproportionate and unfit for purpose”
See also http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/83045A4221DD2AB5CC2575D200165557 http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/fry/F3F97E7FC3FEC848CC2575D300180202 « Last edit by Bronwyn Holloway-Smith on Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:03 am. » |
Page: 1
This forum uses UseBB software